The PPWR Regulation (EU) 2025/40 sets the new European rules on packaging and packaging waste. It turns packaging compliance into a data exercise: collecting, structuring and proving your suppliers' data, material by material.
The public milestones of the regulation; details depend on packaging categories and implementing acts.
Entry into force
Published in the Official Journal on 22 January 2025, in force twenty days later.
Past
General application
The regulation applies, including the PFAS restriction for food contact packaging.
In force
Harmonised labelling
Label showing material composition, or 24 months after the implementing act if later.
To prepare
Recyclability and recycled content
Packaging at least class C; first recycled plastic thresholds.
To anticipate
End of class C
Only classes A and B remain allowed, with exceptions.
To anticipate
This guide covers the regulatory basics, then focuses on the operational angle that is rarely addressed: supplier data management (materials, recycled content, substances of concern, documentary evidence, traceability of declarations). It is written for Quality, Purchasing, Regulatory, Supply Chain and R&D teams.
Key takeaways
The PPWR is Regulation (EU) 2025/40, which entered into force on 11 February 2025 and generally applies from 12 August 2026. It replaces Directive 94/62/EC.
It sets requirements across the whole life cycle: recyclability, recycled content, minimisation, reuse, substances of concern (including PFAS) and harmonised labelling.
There is no size threshold: every company placing a packaged product on the EU market is concerned, with responsibility extending to importers.
The difficulty is not the text but the supplier data: composition, recycled content, declarations of conformity, documentary evidence.
Deadlines run from 2026 to 2040: starting data collection now avoids compliance under pressure.
The same supplier data feeds PPWR and EUDR: think of a shared foundation rather than separate projects.
What is the PPWR Regulation?
The PPWR is the European regulation on packaging and packaging waste (Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation). Published as (EU) 2025/40, it replaces Directive 94/62/EC and applies to all packaging placed on the Union market.
“It shall apply from 12 August 2026. […] This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.”Regulation (EU) 2025/40, Article 71 · EUR-Lex, official text
Definition and scope
The text covers the whole packaging life cycle: design, placing on the market, use, collection and end-of-life treatment. It governs:
The scope covers sales packaging, grouped packaging and transport packaging, as well as takeaway food services, e-commerce and industrial packaging.
Regulation vs directive: what actually changes
The difference is legal, but it has major operational consequences:
Criterion
Directive (94/62/EC)
Regulation (EU) 2025/40
Transposition
Each Member State transposes it into national law
Directly applicable, no transposition
Harmonisation
Diverging national interpretations
A single framework for the whole EU
Practical effect
Requirements vary from country to country
Identical requirements in all 27 Member States
In short: where you previously had to follow several national regimes, the PPWR text now applies in the same way across the EU. It is a simplification for companies selling in several countries, but also a uniform requirement: there is no longer a "more lenient country" to fall back on.
Key point
The PPWR is a regulation, not a directive. It applies directly in all Member States, without national transposition, which harmonises obligations but removes room for local interpretation.
The PPWR regulation does not only target packaging manufacturers. It covers the whole chain, with responsibility reaching upstream.
The players concerned
Companies placing products on the market: any company that places a packaged product on the EU market, including brands and manufacturers.
Importers: responsible for the packaging of imported products placed on the EU market.
Distributors: players who make packaged products available.
Packaging manufacturers: required to provide the information and declarations needed for compliance.
Material and component suppliers: concerned by the transmission of data on composition, recycled content and substances.
A decisive point: no size threshold
An often underestimated point: the PPWR has no size threshold. An SME placing a packaged product on the market is concerned in the same way as a large group. There is no "small business" regime that would automatically exempt a company from data collection.
The key date: 12 August 2026
The regulation generally applies from 12 August 2026. Some obligations have their own timeline (PFAS, labelling, recyclability, recycled content). In other words, the responsibility of the company placing products on the market does not stop at its plant: it extends to the packaging of its products, and therefore to the data provided by its own suppliers.
Key point
No size threshold: if you place a packaged product on the EU market after 12 August 2026, you are concerned. Compliance largely depends on the quality of the data your suppliers send you.
The PPWR timeline spans more than fifteen years. The deadlines below summarise the known public milestones; the exact details depend on packaging categories and implementing acts, to be checked for your situation.
Deadline
Related obligations
12 August 2026
General application of the regulation. PFAS restriction for food contact packaging. Expected adoption of implementing acts (including labelling).
12 August 2028
General obligation for harmonised labelling (material composition), or 24 months after the relevant acts enter into force if later.
2030
Design for recycling: at least class C to be placed on the market. First thresholds for recycled plastic content. Packaging waste reduction target (~5% compared with 2018).
2035
"Recycled at scale" criterion combined with design for recycling. Packaging waste reduction target (~10% compared with 2018).
2038
Ban on packaging graded C (with exceptions): only grades A and B remain allowed.
2026-2028 = documentation window. Labelling, PFAS and preparation of declarations. This is when data collection really begins.
2030-2035 = materials window. Recycled content and recyclability require precise knowledge of the composition of packaging and its components.
2038-2040 = design window. Material choices must anticipate the ban on packaging that is hard to recycle.
Key point
The timeline is not linear: each deadline relies on reliable packaging data. Collecting composition and recycled content from 2026 avoids rebuilding this information in a rush in 2030.
PPWR requirements by material
PPWR packaging requirements differ by material. The table below summarises, for each family, the points to watch and the data to collect from suppliers.
Material
Points to watch
Data to collect
Plastic
Recycled content per component, recyclability, food contact, PFAS
Layer-by-layer composition, adhesives, barriers, separability, alternatives considered
What this table changes for your purchasing
Each row is a specification to document, not just a product characteristic. The difficulty is not knowing the material family, but obtaining the proof: a recycled content rate calculated with a defined method, a recent PFAS test result, an up-to-date food contact declaration of conformity.
Key point
Each PPWR requirement by material always translates into a precise piece of data to source. Without a central repository, this information stays scattered across technical data sheets, supplier emails and Excel files.
The 6 key requirements to master
Six requirements structure packaging compliance. Each one translates into data to collect and prove.
Recyclability
From 2030, packaging must be designed for recycling and reach at least class C. The ban on class C packaging is planned for 2038. This means knowing the detailed composition of the packaging and the ability of recycling streams to process it.
Minimum recycled content
Minimum thresholds for post-consumer recycled plastic apply per packaging category, calculated as an average per plant and per year. Without data from the supplier, the declared rate cannot be justified.
Minimisation
The regulation sets packaging waste reduction targets compared with 2018. This drives reductions in weight, volume and number of layers - which means knowing the grammage and exact structure of each packaging item.
Reuse
Reuse targets apply to certain packaging (beverages, takeaway food, e-commerce, transport). This requires tracking reusability and, for reused packaging, its rotation cycle.
Substances of concern and PFAS
Article 5 requires the presence of substances of concern to be minimised. For PPWR PFAS, the restriction applicable from 12 August 2026 targets food contact packaging, with regulatory thresholds (25 ppb, 250 ppb, 50 ppm depending on the case) and a justification requirement if total fluorine exceeds 50 mg/kg. These thresholds and their applicability must be checked for your situation and your use categories.
Harmonised labelling
Labelling showing material composition and sorting instructions becomes mandatory from 12 August 2028 (or later if the implementing acts are adopted later). This requires reliable composition data upstream.
Key point
The six requirements rely on three families of data: material composition, recycled content and substances. Collecting these three foundations covers most of the documentation obligations.
What supplier data to collect to prove compliance
This is the operational core of the topic. A PPWR declaration of conformity is only valuable if it relies on verifiable, traced and up-to-date data. Here is the list to structure.
Material composition: breakdown in % by material and by component.
Recycled content rate: value per component, with calculation method and scope.
Substances of concern: presence, concentration, PFAS declaration.
Food contact: status and associated declaration of conformity.
Recyclability: grade or design-for-recycling justification.
Weight and structure: grammage, number of layers, volume.
Reuse status: reusable or single-use packaging.
Types of evidence to require
Type of evidence
What it establishes
Technical data sheet
Declared composition and characteristics
Declaration of conformity
Regulatory compliance binding the supplier
Safety data sheet (SDS)
Substances and hazards
Laboratory test report
PFAS results and other measurements
Material / origin certificate
Recycled content, origin
Supplier statement
Commitments and non-standardised data
Update frequency
Three simple rules prevent outdated declarations:
For every new reference placed on the market.
For every change in specification or formulation (change of material, additive or upstream supplier).
On a recurring schedule (often yearly) or at the request of the customer, auditor or authority.
Key point
Packaging data is only compliant if you know its issuer, date, version and scope. PPWR compliance is first and foremost a document traceability problem.
SuppliersRaw materials, components, laboratories: data sheets, certificates, test reports
Packaging manufacturerConformity assessment and technical documentation
EU declaration of conformityDrawn up on the regulation's model, kept up to date
Company placing on the marketEvidence available for each reference placed on the market
Recycled content without a calculation methodUndocumented componentEvidence without a date or version
The declaration is only the visible part: its value depends on the data collected upstream.
PPWR and EUDR: two regulations, the same supplier data
Many manufacturers treat the PPWR and the EUDR (the European regulation on deforestation) as two separate projects. That is a mistake: both rely on the same supplier data.
Common ground
PPWR
EUDR
Subject
Packaging and packaging waste
Products linked to deforestation (including wood, paper, cardboard)
For cardboard or wood packaging, the origin data required by the EUDR directly overlaps with the PPWR documentation requirement. Pooling supplier data collection - one portal, one product record, one update cycle - avoids duplicating requests to suppliers and fragmenting the evidence.
This convergence is detailed in the EUDR compliance guide for the supply chain. Handling both regulations on a shared data foundation reduces the burden on suppliers and makes declarations more reliable.
Key point
PPWR and EUDR are not competing but complementary. For paper, cardboard and wood packaging, data from one regulation serves the other. Building a shared repository avoids two collections for the same reality.
How to structure PPWR compliance in your information system
Compliance rarely fails for lack of tools: it fails for lack of centralisation. Here is how the existing building blocks share the work.
The role of each tool
ERP: holds master product and supplier data, but handles documents and their versions poorly.
PLM: holds specifications and the packaging bill of materials (packaging BOM), useful for composition.
Supplier portal: the channel for collecting and updating data and evidence.
Compliance repository: centralises documents, deadlines and statuses.
Why Excel quickly reaches its limits
A spreadsheet does not natively handle:
the version of a document and its history;
update deadlines and reminders;
the link between a packaging item, a supplier, a finished product and a declaration;
the traceability of who declared what, when, and on what basis;
the extraction of data contained in heterogeneous PDFs.
An Excel file can start a data collection; it cannot carry the compliance of a packaging portfolio across several regulatory deadlines.
The role of centralisation
A platform that centralises supplier and product data makes it possible to:
collect packaging data from suppliers through a single channel;
structure composition, recycled content and substances in a usable format;
track the deadlines for updates and expiring declarations;
use AI on documents (technical data sheets, declarations, reports) to extract critical data.
With Tracklab
Tracklab follows this approach: centralising supplier and product data, automating document collection, tracking deadlines and using AI on documents. It is not an ERP, nor a production or inventory management tool, nor a regulatory watch tool.
ERP and PLM are not enough to carry documentary evidence. PPWR compliance requires a repository that links supplier, packaging, document and deadline - a role a spreadsheet cannot sustain over time.
The 7 common mistakes in a PPWR compliance project
Treating the PPWR as a regulatory watch topic, not a data topic. Knowing the regulation exists does not make you compliant: only provable supplier data does.
Waiting until 2026 to start collecting. Rebuilding the composition and recycled content of a packaging portfolio takes months.
Using Excel as the compliance repository. No versions, no deadlines, no links: the evidence becomes impossible to find.
Not tracking document versions. A declaration without a date or version has no value in an audit.
Confusing a declaration of conformity with a technical data sheet. The first commits the supplier on compliance; the second describes the product. Both are needed, but they are not interchangeable.
Not linking packaging, component and finished product. Without this link, it is impossible to isolate the packaging affected by a given requirement.
Forgetting non-EU suppliers and importers. The responsibility of the company placing products on the market extends to imported packaging, even if the supplier is abroad.
Key point
Most failures do not come from a poor understanding of the text, but from data that is not centralised, not dated or not linked to the right packaging.
PPWR checklist: 15 points before the deadline
To check
1. Map all packaging placed on the market (sales, grouped, transport).
2. Identify the companies placing products on the market and the importers in the chain.
3. List packaging, material and component suppliers.
4. Document the material composition of each packaging item.
5. Collect the recycled content rate per component, with the calculation method.
6. Check the food contact compliance of the packaging concerned.
7. Gather PFAS declarations and test results for food packaging.
8. Assess recyclability (grade or design justification).
9. Check the reuse status of reusable packaging.
10. Centralise documentary evidence per packaging item and per supplier.
11. Set up tracking of versions and validity dates.
12. Plan the 2026, 2028, 2030, 2035 and 2040 deadlines.
13. Link each packaging item to the finished product and the supplier.
14. Prepare the shared data foundation with the EUDR (wood, paper, cardboard).
15. Test traceability: find the evidence for a given packaging item in a few minutes.
Decisions to make and next steps
PPWR compliance is not decided by reading the text, but by four decisions:
Choose a single repository. Decide where packaging data, documents and deadlines live - and accept that a spreadsheet cannot carry that responsibility.
Prioritise by risk. Start with food contact packaging (PFAS, 2026) and the categories subject to recycled content.
Pool with the EUDR. A shared supplier data foundation for wood, paper and cardboard packaging.
Trace from day one. Date, version, issuer and scope for every piece of evidence.
The concrete next step: map your packaging and your suppliers, then test whether you can find, for a given packaging item, its composition, recycled content and declaration of conformity in a few minutes. If the answer is no, that is the first project to open - before the 2026 and 2028 deadlines make it mandatory.
Free resources
Take action with our PPWR resources.
Two free tools, built by the Tracklab team from the text of Regulation (EU) 2025/40, to frame your action plan and collect evidence from your suppliers.
TracklabPPWR collection kit
Kit · 8-page PDF + spreadsheet
PPWR collection kit
The step-by-step method to obtain PPWR evidence from your suppliers (PFAS, substances, recyclability, recycled content), with the questionnaire and evidence matrix ready to send.
8-page method guide
Ready-to-use supplier questionnaire
Evidence matrix and reminder tracking
TracklabPPWR checklist and timeline 2026-2040
Checklist · 3-page PDF
PPWR checklist and timeline 2026-2040
All the deadlines of Regulation (EU) 2025/40 on a single timeline, and the checklist of actions to start now, article by article.
Timeline of deadlines 2026 → 2040
Checklist by main workstream
References to the articles of the regulation
PPWR resource
Enter your details to access the download immediately.
✓ Ready
The files open in Google Drive. For the spreadsheet, Google offers to make a copy in your own Drive.
Going further
Packaging data proven, reference by reference.
Centralisation of supplier and product data, per packaging item and per component
Automated document collection and deadline tracking for each piece of evidence
AI processing of technical data sheets, declarations and test reports
Barrier film · Ref. FB-220Packaging manufacturer · Composition declaration
Complete
CA
Cardboard tray · Ref. BC-114Supplier · PFAS status of the coating
Test expired
PP
Lid film · Ref. OP-07Component supplier · Recycled content + method
Complete
ET
Label · Ref. ET-31Printer · Inks and adhesives sheet
Reminder D+3
FAQ
PPWR: your questions.
Does the PPWR apply in France?
Yes. As a Union regulation, the PPWR applies directly in all Member States, including France, without transposition. There is therefore no PPWR law as a national transposition text: the European regulation applies, supplemented by implementing acts and the related national provisions. Some details remain to be checked for your situation.
Does the PPWR replace EPR?
The PPWR reshapes extended producer responsibility (EPR) within a harmonised European framework. EPR for commercial packaging remains a central mechanism: companies placing products on the market continue to contribute to packaging waste management, but design and data requirements are added. National rules must be checked.
Which packaging is excluded from the PPWR?
The regulation covers the vast majority of packaging, with certain categories or specific uses handled separately (for example some packaging linked to regulated uses or particular sectors). The exact list of exclusions and derogations depends on the implementing acts: to be checked for your situation.
Who declares conformity?
Compliance is carried by the company placing the product on the market or the player that places the packaging on the EU market. In practice, it relies on declarations from its packaging, material and component suppliers. The PPWR declaration of conformity must be available and justifiable. Answers to the most frequent questions are gathered in our PPWR FAQ.
What are the penalties for non-compliance?
The PPWR provides for a penalty regime defined and enforced by the Member States. Amounts and procedures therefore vary by country: to be checked for your jurisdiction and your situation.
Does the PPWR apply to imported packaging?
Yes. As soon as a packaged product is placed on the EU market, the requirements apply, whatever the origin of the packaging. The importer bears responsibility equivalent to that of the company placing the product on the market. This means collecting data from non-EU suppliers.
What does the PPWR PFAS restriction require in practice?
For food contact packaging, the restriction applies from 12 August 2026, with regulatory thresholds and a justification requirement above a certain level of total fluorine. Testing and demonstration methods are specified by implementing texts: to be checked for your situation.
Does the PPWR apply to small volumes or SMEs?
Yes. There is no size threshold exempting a company. An SME placing a packaged product on the market is concerned in the same way as a large group.
The PPWR guide
Go deeper into each obligation.
Detailed guides to move from the text to the evidence, on the points that raise the most questions.
Their quality and purchasing teams collect, control and leverage their supplier data with Tracklab.
150+
companies supported
40,000+
suppliers referenced
70,000+
products and ingredients
Customer testimonial · Bouvard
“Tracklab has eliminated the blind spots that existed in our document monitoring. Every document is analysed, every change is detected and every decision is traceable. This has enabled us to take a real step forward in terms of professionalism and credibility, particularly with auditors and customers.”
EVEllen V.Quality Director, Bouvard Pro
CyberVadis Excellence rating
Independent assessment of our cybersecurity framework and of the protection of the data entrusted to Tracklab.