Indiquez vos coordonnées pour accéder immédiatement au téléchargement.
Le fichier s’ouvre dans Google Drive : vous pouvez le télécharger ou l’imprimer.
BRC Food certification - more precisely BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety certification - attests that a food processing or packing site controls the safety, quality, legality and authenticity of its products, in accordance with the private BRCGS standard (British Retail Consortium Global Standards), recognised by the GFSI. It is required by many British and international retailers before they list a supplier. Tracklab supports Quality, Purchasing and Supply Chain teams throughout this process: the platform centralises supplier and product data, automates document collection, tracks deadlines and uses AI to exploit document content, so that theBRC Food audit file is complete, up to date and demonstrable. The audit and the certification decision remain the sole responsibility of an accredited certification body.
The BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety, in its current version (Issue 9), applies to organisations that manufacture, process or pack food. It structures its requirements around nine chapters: senior management commitment and continual improvement, the food safety plan (HACCP), the food safety and quality management system, site standards, product control, process control, personnel, risk zones (high-risk / high-care) and traded goods (traded products).
The Food Safety standard distinguishes 18 product categories. The applicable category or categories depend on your products and processes, and must be agreed with the certification body, which assigns an auditor competent in those categories.
| Category | Product type |
|---|---|
| 1 to 4 | Raw meat and fish, raw prepared products |
| 5 and 6 | Fruit, vegetables and nuts, raw then prepared |
| 7 | Dairy products and liquid egg |
| 8 | Cooked meat and fish products |
| 9 | Raw cured and/or fermented products (meat, fish) |
| 10 | Ready meals, sandwiches and ready-to-eat desserts |
| 11 | Low- and high-acid products in cans or jars |
| 12 and 13 | Beverages, alcoholic drinks and fermented products |
| 14 | Bakery |
| 15 | Dried foods and ingredients |
| 16 and 17 | Confectionery, breakfast cereals and snacks |
| 18 | Oils and fats |
If your products fall under several categories, discuss this upstream with the certification body: several categories may need to be listed and audited. The scope of the certificate is therefore a decision to be framed early, as it determines the audit duration, the auditor's competence and your documentation obligations.
The Food Safety standard primarily targets food production and packing sites:
Activities without a production site - brokerage, import, trading - fall under another BRCGS scheme, presented in our article on IFS and BRC for brokers and on our page BRC Broker certification. Logistics and storage, for their part, fall under the Storage & Distribution scheme.
BRCGS was originally developed by the British Retail Consortium, the association of British retailers, to set a common baseline of requirements for suppliers. Its adoption has since extended to many international retailers and customers, who include it in their listing specifications. In practice, for a supplier, BRCGS Food certification is often a condition of access to certain retailers: without a valid certificate covering the required scope, listing is blocked or subject to additional customer audits.
Our guide to BRC certification places the Food scheme within the full range of BRCGS standards.
The engagement covers the preparation, achievement and maintenance of certification. It secures the evidence, supplier data and deadline management.
To define the service without ambiguity:
Each step produces a deliverable that feeds into the next. Durations vary according to your document maturity, the state of your supplier data and the target audit date.
Definition of the sites, product families, applicable BRCGS categories and target audit date, with everyone's roles: who provides what, who validates what.
Review of the requirements one by one, with the situation observed, the evidence available and any gap. Objective: to obtain a reliable picture of the starting point, without judging the organisation.
Ranking of gaps by criticality and effort: what blocks certification, what weakens the audit, what falls under continuous improvement.
This is where the platform takes over: automated collection from suppliers, completeness and validity checks, indexing and AI extraction of critical information. The file becomes accessible in a single place.
Preparation for the logistics of the audit: site tour route, key people, documents to be retrieved quickly. A mock audit tests the robustness of the set-up before the official date.
The audit is conducted by the accredited certification body, according to its protocol (announced or unannounced). Our role: to provide a complete file and well-prepared contacts.
Root cause analysis, treatment and closure evidence. The BRCGS guide provides for a period of 28 days after the audit to close non-conformities; the evidence must be admissible and versioned.
The certificate has a date: maintain the evidence, track deadlines, prepare the surveillance and then recertification audits. Each site must also plan for at least one unannounced audit according to the frequency defined by the BRCGS protocol.
| Deliverable | What it is for |
|---|---|
| Map of applicable requirements | Knowing what the auditor will check, clause by clause |
| Gap analysis report | Knowing the starting point and the missing evidence |
| Compliance matrix and action plan | Managing actions, owners and deadlines |
| Centralised document register | Finding every document, its version and its validity date |
| Deadline calendar and alerts | Anticipating certificates, training, internal audits and calibrations |
| Indexed audit file | Presenting evidence quickly on the day |
| Procedure and record templates | Getting started without a blank page |
| Compliance dashboard | Tracking the compliance rate and open or closed gaps |
This foundation follows the same logic as our page compliance and certifications, applied to the Food standard.
The exact list depends on the issue of the standard and on your product categories: always check the applicable version. Five families come up systematically when preparing a BRC Food audit.
The HACCP plan is the core of the standard. It includes hazard analysis (biological, chemical, physical, allergens), determination of critical control points, validated critical limits, monitoring, corrective actions and verification. It must be updated after any change of product, process or ingredient.
The control plan covers the analyses and tests carried out on raw materials, finished products and the environment: parameters analysed, frequencies, methods, laboratories, and handling of non-conforming results. It must be consistent with the hazard analysis and documented.
The standard requires upstream and downstream traceability that is demonstrable and regularly tested, together with a recall and withdrawal procedure. The traceability test must be dated and its results retained.
This covers allergen hazard analysis, the associated cleaning plan, validation of production changes, labelling and communication. The gap between written procedure and practice on the ground is scrutinised particularly closely here.
This requires a list of approved suppliers, documented approval criteria, performance evaluation and monitoring, as well as up-to-date specifications, certificates, approvals and analysis results. Non-European suppliers and raw materials vulnerable to fraud receive heightened attention.
These five families rely on data that changes constantly: supplier certificates, technical data sheets, approvals, analyses. A documentation file is of no use if it is incomplete on the day of the visit, hence the value of centralising supplier and product data rather than reconstructing it in a hurry.
These gaps recur during preparation. Checking them upstream often prevents a major non-conformity.
To gauge the risk: a critical non-conformity leads to audit failure, a major one must be corrected and its closure accepted before the certificate is issued, and a minor one does not prevent certification but weighs on the grade.
Three steps are enough to get started properly.
Before this first discussion, prepare on your side:
Still undecided between several standards? See which GFSI certification to choose. Would you first like to see how document data is structured? Discover compliance and certifications. To place the Food offer within the full set of BRCGS schemes, return to our guide to BRC certification.
No. Tracklab prepares and secures the file, but only an accredited third-party body carries out the audit and issues the certificate. Our role is to make the site auditable: data up to date, evidence available, gaps addressed.
Both are private standards recognised by the GFSI, with similar foundations (HACCP, traceability, risk control) but different grading expectations. The decisive criterion is commercial: which certificate do your customers accept, and in which markets. Our comparison BRC vs IFS, our page IFS Food certification and the guide which GFSI certification to choose detail the trade-off.
No, it is not required by law: it is a private standard. In practice it becomes mandatory as soon as a retailer or customer includes it in its listing conditions. For a supplier to British or international retail chains, it is often a condition of access to listing.
It depends on your document maturity, the target BRCGS categories and the number of suppliers to be documented. A site that is already structured moves faster; a site without a document system needs more time. The gap analysis makes it possible to estimate a realistic timetable within the first few weeks.
The audit is conducted by an accredited certification body, according to its protocol: announced or unannounced. Each site must plan for at least one unannounced audit according to the frequency set by the BRCGS protocol; the audit covers the certified scope and ensures that the production presented corresponds to that scope. Our support includes preparation for both scenarios, detailed in our guide to theBRC audit.
Invoicing depends on the scope: number of sites, BRCGS categories covered, volume of suppliers to be documented, expected level of autonomy. An initial scoping allows us to propose a precise scope and budget, with no commitment to an uncontrolled volume of documents.
The official texts and tools on which this guide is based.
In 30 minutes, we test the chain of evidence with you on a few real suppliers.
Their quality and purchasing teams collect, control and leverage their supplier data with Tracklab.
companies supported
suppliers referenced
products and ingredients
“Tracklab has eliminated the blind spots that existed in our document monitoring. Every document is analysed, every change is detected and every decision is traceable. This has enabled us to take a real step forward in terms of professionalism and credibility, particularly with auditors and customers.”

Independent assessment of our cybersecurity framework and of the protection of the data entrusted to Tracklab.
They use Tracklab







Platform
Resources