Indiquez vos coordonnées pour accéder immédiatement au téléchargement.
Le fichier s’ouvre dans Google Drive : vous pouvez le télécharger ou l’imprimer.
BRC Broker certification is certification to the BRCGS Agents and Brokers standard - also referred to as BRC agents and brokers or BRC Broker Standard. It is intended for companies that buy, sell or facilitate trade in food, packaging or consumer goods without manufacturing or processing them : brokers, agents, traders, importers-exporters, distributors and buyers acting on behalf of third parties. Whereas a production site must demonstrate control of its processes, a trading company must demonstrate control of its suppliers and of its documentary information.
Tracklab supports these companies from audit preparation through to maintaining certification: scoping the perimeter, requirement-by-requirement gap analysis, structuring the documentation file, preparing teams and mock audit. The platform centralises supplier and product data, automates document collection, tracks deadlines and uses AI (artificial intelligence) to exploit document content. Tracklab is neither a certification body, nor an ERP, nor a regulatory monitoring tool: the audit and the certification decision are the responsibility of an accredited body.
The standard underpinning BRC Broker certification is the BRCGS Global Standard for Agents and Brokers, in its Issue 3. It is organised into five chapters of requirements:
A key point for a trading company: no requirement relates to a manufacturing facility, since the company has none. For such a company, BRC agents and brokers certification therefore depends on documentary evidence and control of the upstream chain, not on processes.
The eligibility criterion is simple: the company buys, sells or facilitates trade in products that it neither manufactures nor processes. Typically concerned are:
The certified entity is an organisation or an office, not a production site. This is what fundamentally distinguishes this scheme from the other BRCGS standards.
The two standards share a common logic - safety management, risk control, traceability - but they do not measure the same thing.
| Criterion | BRCGS Agents & Brokers (brc broker) | BRCGS Food Safety |
|---|---|---|
| Purpose of the standard | Control of suppliers and documentary information | Control of manufacturing processes and hygiene |
| Core evidence | Approved supplier list, specifications, document traceability, product release | HACCP plan, process controls, facility hygiene, cleaning plans |
| Audit location | Offices, with a warehouse or platform where applicable | Production site |
| Typical activity | Trading, brokerage, import-export, distribution | Manufacturing, processing, packing |
| What triggers a non-conformity | Unapproved supplier or expired evidence | Process or hygiene control gap |
A group may hold both: a production subsidiary certified to BRCGS Food and a trading entity certified to Agents & Brokers. A detailed comparison of these two schemes and of how evidence can be pooled between them is covered in our content IFS and BRC for brokers.
The BRCGS standard originated as an initiative of the British Retail Consortium, the association of British retailers, to set a common baseline of requirements for their suppliers. The Agents & Brokers scheme meets the same need at another link in the chain: major retailers want assurance on theorigin and compliance of the products they buy, including when they go through an intermediary.
In practice, certification often becomes a listing requirement:
The right selection criterion remains commercial: which markets are you targeting, and which standards do your customers accept? This decision grid is detailed in which GFSI certification to choose.
The scope is declared and validated upstream with your certification body. Three rules are worth knowing before preparing for the audit:
The standard is supplemented by position statements (interpretation statements) published by BRCGS, which specify which clauses apply depending on the activities actually carried out. The current version applies to audits conducted from 10 August 2026 : always check it with your certification body before drawing up your preparation plan.
Tracklab works on the preparation, structuring and maintenance of certification. We do not carry out the audit and do not issue certificates.
To define the service clearly:
This service is the "broker" version of our overall BRC certification offer.
Each step produces a deliverable that feeds into the next. Durations vary according to your document maturity, the number of suppliers to be documented and the target audit date.
An initial discussion sets the certified offices, product types, activities and any exclusions, as well as the applicable issue of the standard. It results in a scoping note that serves as the reference for the entire engagement.
The requirements are reviewed one by one: senior management commitment, risk assessment, management system, suppliers and outsourcing, personnel. For each, we record the situation observed, the evidence available and any gap.
Gaps are ranked by criticality and effort: what blocks certification, what weakens the audit, what falls under continuous improvement. Each action is assigned an owner and a deadline.
This is where the platform takes over: automated collection of documents from suppliers, completeness and validity checks, indexing, then AI extraction of critical information (certificate number, expiry date, scope covered, analysis results). Each product reference is linked to its specification and its suppliers.
We help you check that the chosen body is registered for the Agents & Brokers scheme and prepare the scope declaration elements. The certification decision and the organisation of the visit remain its responsibility.
A document review and interviews in the format of a real audit test the robustness of the set-up: can an auditor find a piece of evidence within a limited time, is critical information linked to the right reference, are answers to typical questions available?
The audit is conducted by the accredited body. Our role: to provide a complete file and well-prepared contacts so that every requirement can be demonstrated quickly.
The gaps raised are analysed through root cause analysis and then addressed. The grade obtained determines the next step in the cycle:
| Grade | Certificate validity | Consequence |
|---|---|---|
| AA, A or B | 12 months | Annual recertification |
| C | 6 months | Next audit within six months |
| D | No certification | Corrections to be made, followed by a new audit |
The certificate is generally issued within 42 calendar days of the first day of the audit, provided that the certification requirements are met. Maintenance then consists of keeping evidence up to date and preparing for the surveillance and then renewal audits.
| Deliverable | What it is for |
|---|---|
| Scoping note | Scope, issue of the standard, certified offices, exclusions |
| Gap analysis report | Knowing the starting point, with missing evidence identified |
| Compliance matrix and action plan | Managing actions, owners and deadlines |
| Centralised document register | Finding every document, its version and its validity date |
| Approved supplier list and associated evidence | Demonstrating supplier approval and monitoring |
| Upstream-downstream traceability matrix | Linking supplier, batch and delivered product |
| Deadline calendar and alerts | Anticipating certificates, analyses, training and internal audits |
| Indexed audit file | Presenting evidence quickly on the day of the visit |
| Mock audit report | Formalising the points to correct before the official audit |
These deliverables follow the same logic as our module compliance and certifications, applied to the Agents & Brokers scheme.
The standard is demanding on evidence, often more so than on the activity itself. Here are the five areas to master as a priority.
Each supplier must be approved according to defined criteria, then monitored over time. In practice, the auditor expects an up-to-date approved supplier list, the approval criteria and evidence (recognised certificate, approval, audit, documented questionnaire, performance history), and a periodic evaluation record. The usual difficulty is not the procedure, but the freshness of the evidence : an expired supplier certificate on a sensitive reference is enough to generate a non-conformity.
Each reference bought or sold must be covered by an up-to-date specification, describing the product, its origin, its composition or characteristics, its storage conditions and its allergens where applicable. A generic specification, not linked to a specific reference, is not sufficient. The point to watch: the version sold must match the documented version.
For a trading company, traceability is documentary : knowing, for a given delivery, which suppliers and which batches are involved, and vice versa. It must be possible to test it on a complete flow, upstream to the source and downstream to the customer. This principle is in line with the "one step back, one step forward" regulatory traceability obligation laid down in Regulation (EC) No 178/2002. An undocumented traceability test, or one limited to a single direction, is regularly raised in audits.
Customer complaints must be recorded, analysed, handled and followed up until the effectiveness of the action has been verified. The standard expects a procedure, a usable register and the ability to demonstrate that recurring feedback feeds into continuous improvement. An incomplete register, or a complaint without an identified root cause, weakens the file.
Any service provider involved in the product flow or in information must be controlled in the same way as a supplier: warehousing, transport, analytical laboratories, contract packing, security or inspection services. The auditor checks that these services are approved, monitored and covered by agreements specifying responsibilities. This is an aspect often underestimated by trading companies that outsource part of their logistics.
The standard requires a formalised hazard and risk assessment relating to the company's products and activities: nature of the products, origin, vulnerability to fraud or adulteration, transport and storage conditions, target customers. This analysis must be reviewed in the event of a significant change (new product, new country of origin, new supplier) and serves as the basis for the controls put in place.
These gaps recur during preparation. Checking them upstream often prevents a major non-conformity.
Three steps are enough to get started properly.
Before this first discussion, prepare on your side:
Still undecided between several standards? See which GFSI certification to choose. Would you first like to see how document data is structured? Discover compliance and certifications.
No. Tracklab prepares and secures the file, but only an accredited third-party body registered with BRCGS carries out the audit and issues the certificate. Our role is to make you auditable: data up to date, evidence available, gaps addressed.
A manufacturer or processor falls under the BRCGS Food Safety, which focuses on processes and hygiene. A company that buys, sells or facilitates trade without processing falls under the Agents & Brokers standard, which focuses on supplier control and documentary information.
Yes. The scheme is designed for activities without a production site. The scope covers the certified offices and the activity actually carried out; any warehouses and service providers are then controlled and documented as outsourced services.
Grades AA, A and B give a certificate valid for 12 months; grade C reduces validity to 6 months and brings the next audit forward; grade D does not lead to certification. The grade therefore determines the frequency of the cycle and how demanding maintenance will be.
Both are private standards recognised by the GFSI, with similar foundations but different grading and recognition expectations. The decisive criterion is commercial: which standard do your customers accept, and in which markets? Our comparison BRC vs IFS sets out the general framework. See our page IFS Broker certification and our comparison IFS and BRC for brokers to decide.
It depends on your document maturity and the number of suppliers to be documented. A company that is already structured moves faster; a company without a document system needs more time. The gap analysis provides a realistic estimate within the first few weeks.
The official texts and tools on which this guide is based.
In 30 minutes, we test the chain of evidence for a representative supplier with you.
Their quality and purchasing teams collect, control and leverage their supplier data with Tracklab.
companies supported
suppliers referenced
products and ingredients
“Tracklab has eliminated the blind spots that existed in our document monitoring. Every document is analysed, every change is detected and every decision is traceable. This has enabled us to take a real step forward in terms of professionalism and credibility, particularly with auditors and customers.”

Independent assessment of our cybersecurity framework and of the protection of the data entrusted to Tracklab.
They use Tracklab







Platform
Resources